A company requires that data stored in AWS be encrypted at rest. Which of the following approaches achieve this requirement? Select 2 answers from the options
given below.
Please select:
A. When storing data in Amazon EBS, use only EBS-optimized Amazon EC2 instances.
B. When storing data in EBS, encrypt the volume by using AWS KMS.
C. When storing data in Amazon S3, use object versioning and MFA Delete.
D. When storing data in Amazon EC2 Instance Store, encrypt the volume by using KMS.
E. When storing data in S3, enable server-side encryptio
Answer: BE
✅ Explanation
-AWS provides multiple ways to encrypt data at rest using services like Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, and AWS KMS (Key Management Service).
🔍 Option Analysis:
A. When storing data in Amazon EBS, use only EBS-optimized Amazon EC2 instances.
❌ EBS-optimized instances improve I/O performance, but they do not handle encryption.
B. When storing data in EBS, encrypt the volume by using AWS KMS.
✅ This is the recommended and secure method to encrypt EBS volumes at rest.
C. When storing data in Amazon S3, use object versioning and MFA Delete.
❌ Object versioning and MFA Delete improve data integrity and protection, but do not encrypt data.
D. When storing data in Amazon EC2 Instance Store, encrypt the volume by using KMS.
❌ EC2 instance store volumes are ephemeral and do not support native KMS-based encryption.
E. When storing data in S3, enable server-side encryption
✅ Server-side encryption (SSE) with Amazon S3-managed keys (SSE-S3) or KMS (SSE-KMS) is the correct approach for encrypting S3 data at rest.